Guwahati, Oct 28 (SocialNews.XYZ) A court in Guwahati on Wednesday has directed Assam Police to ensure the safety of Ghanakanta Gogoi, the prime accused in the October 26 Hotel Bilas Inn shooting that claimed five lives and left another person injured, amid concerns raised by his lawyer over possible custodial violence.

The Chief Judicial Magistrate’s (CJM) court issued a series of safeguards after Gogoi’s advocate expressed apprehension that the accused could be subjected to ill-treatment or face an encounter while in police custody.

According to the court’s directions, police must not torture the accused and must ensure that he receives adequate food, drinking water and other basic necessities during interrogation. The court has also ordered that Gogoi undergo medical examinations every 24 hours and directed the police to provide adequate security, particularly during the night, to protect him while in custody.

As part of the safeguards, police have been barred from taking Gogoi out of custody before sunrise or after sunset. In case he needs to be taken out for interrogation or recovery of evidence, an officer of Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP) rank must accompany him, according to the details of the order.

The court further cautioned that police personnel would be held responsible if the accused escaped from custody. The investigating officer has also been directed to comply with the Supreme Court’s guidelines in the D.K. Basu versus State of West Bengal case, which prescribe safeguards against custodial abuse.

Gogoi, 34, was arrested on October 26, hours after the shooting at Hotel Bilas Inn in Guwahati’s Lachit Nagar area. He was produced before the CJM court on October 27 and remanded to seven days of police custody.

According to the police, the shooting stemmed from a dispute over the hotel’s lease agreement. The disagreement allegedly escalated ahead of a meeting intended to resolve the property-related dispute.

Gogoi’s lawyer has claimed that his client acted in self-defence. However, the claim has not been independently established, and the circumstances surrounding the shooting remain under investigation.

The police are continuing their investigation into the incident that has triggered widespread concern in Guwahati.

According to Guwahati Police Commissioner Partha Sarathi Mahanta, Gogoi was arrested within an hour of the incident. Police also seized a .32-calibre pistol allegedly used in the shooting.

Police are examining the circumstances surrounding the hotel’s lease, which had reportedly expired, as well as discussions over its renewal. Allegations of unpaid rent and outstanding electricity dues have also emerged in reports concerning the dispute.

Source: IANS

The post Guwahati shooting incident: Court orders safety measures for accused appeared first on Social News XYZ.

Kochi, Oct 28 (SocialNews.XYZ) An Additional District Judge, whose 17-year-old son was involved in a road accident at Cheranalloor in which an elderly man was killed, was questioned by the police for around three hours on Wednesday, and asked to appear again on Thursday.

The crash occurred at around 2.20 a.m. on October 25 on Container Road in Cheranalloor, near Kochi. Jayabalakrishnan, 55, was returning home after closing his roadside eatery when the Mercedes-Benz, allegedly driven by the judge's minor son, hit his scooter.

He died on the spot, leaving behind his wife and three children.

The judge, who has been named as an accused in the case, was summoned to the Aluva Police Club at around 2.40 p.m. on Wednesday.

He was allowed to leave after the questioning.

The case has drawn attention as it involves the minor son of a serving judicial officer.

The police are investigating the circumstances surrounding the accident and the alleged role of those involved.

Meanwhile reports have surfaced that the Kerala High Court Administrative Committee has decided against taking immediate action against the judge.

It will consider the matter after two days, based on the police investigation report.

The development comes after a report by the High Court judge in charge of Thrissur district recommended that the Additional District Judge be suspended.

The Administrative Committee, however, decided that further action should await the findings of the police investigation.

The decision indicates that the committee wants the facts to be established before proceeding against the judicial officer.

The police are expected to continue questioning the judge as part of the investigation.

His appearance on Thursday is expected to help investigators clarify the circumstances surrounding the accident and the allegations against him.

The case has raised questions about the conduct of those involved in the accident and the course of the investigation.

Further action against the judge will depend on the findings placed before the authorities.

In a related development four police officials attached to the local station which registered the case was suspended and the Kochi City Police Commissioner was on Wednesday transferred out .

Source: IANS

The post Mercedes hit-and-run: Judge questioned for three hours in accident involving minor son in Kerala appeared first on Social News XYZ.

Kolkata, Oct 28 (SocialNews.XYZ) Former West Bengal Tourism Minister and former Minister of State for Information & Cultural Affairs Indranil Sen was arrested by Kolkata Police on Wednesday evening in connection with an alleged fake Durga Puja pass scam linked to UNESCO-tagged festival tours.

According to investigators, Sen and his wife, Madhuchanda Sen, are accused of irregularities in the sale of fake passes for Durga Puja tours. The transactions under scrutiny were initially estimated to involve around Rs 60 crore.

Earlier in the day, the singer-turned-politician appeared before the Enforcement Directorate (ED), which is conducting a parallel probe into the matter.

During his questioning at the agency's Salt Lake office, Kolkata Police personnel, along with officers from Bidhannagar City Police, remained stationed outside the premises.

After the ED interrogation concluded, police took Sen into custody and transported him to the Kolkata Police headquarters at Lalbazar. A police source said the former minister had allegedly not been cooperating with the investigation, leading to his arrest.

Earlier this month, Sen approached the Supreme Court with an anticipatory bail petition after a single-judge bench of the Calcutta High Court rejected his plea earlier.

Since the apex court was closed for a week, the matter could not be heard. However, before the matter could come up for hearing in the apex court, he was arrested by the Kolkata Police.

The Kolkata Police launched the investigation following a complaint registered at Bowbazar Police Station. The ED subsequently took over the investigation by registering an Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR).

Last month, the central agency conducted raids and searches at multiple locations, including Sen’s residence, the premises of some of his relatives and the office or premises of an event manager connected with the case. The agency also questioned Sen twice as part of its investigation.

Anticipating arrest, Sen first approached the Calcutta High Court through his counsel, seeking anticipatory bail. The plea came up for hearing before a single-judge bench of Justice Tirthankar Ghosh on October 15. After hearing the matter, the court rejected his application.

Earlier this month, the ED issued a statement naming former West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee in connection with a transaction involving Sen-owned Octave Records.

According to the agency, nearly Rs 30 lakh was allegedly transferred from the company’s accounts to Banerjee through banking channels. Sen, however, maintained that the payment was made as royalty.

Separately, a judicial inquiry commission constituted by the West Bengal government to investigate alleged institutional corruption during the previous Trinamool Congress regime has initiated an inquiry involving Sen.

The commission is examining alleged multi-crore irregularities in the tendering process of the state’s Information and Cultural Affairs Department, where Sen had served as Minister of State. The inquiry is separate from the money laundering investigation being conducted by the ED.

Source: IANS

The post Former Bengal minister Indranil Sen arrested over fake Durga Puja pass scam appeared first on Social News XYZ.

Lucknow, Oct 28 (SocialNews.XYZ) The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has provisionally attached land and buildings belonging to Mohammad Ali Jauhar University in Uttar Pradesh's Rampur district, valued at Rs 426.46 crore in connection with a money laundering probe involving the Maulana Mohammad Ali Jauhar Trust, Samajwadi Party leader and former minister Mohammad Azam Khan, and others, an official statement said on Wednesday.

According to the ED, the attached assets have a current estimated market value of around Rs 1,170 crore. The university campus, located at Jauhar Nagar in Rampur's Singhankhera village, is owned by the Maulana Mohammad Ali Jauhar Trust, which was founded and is controlled by Azam Khan, who also serves as the institution's honorary Chancellor.

The investigation stems from 26 FIRs registered at Azeem Nagar police station in Rampur, alleging that agricultural land belonging to farmers was forcibly acquired for the university.

The ED said enquiries by the district administration also found that nearly 34 acres of enemy property at Singhankhera village had allegedly been occupied for the university despite the cancellation of the land lease. The land has since been recovered by the Custodian of Enemy Property through the district administration.

The agency claimed its investigation revealed that funds intended for public works were diverted to the university, government-funded projects were executed on the private campus, and money from contractors awarded government contracts was routed back to the trust as donations.

The ED has also taken up investigation of 28 additional FIRs registered against Azam Khan and others in Rampur. These cases include allegations that several houses were demolished in 2016 and that material and equipment linked to public projects were diverted for use at the university campus. The allegations are part of charge sheets filed by the police.

According to the agency, contractors involved in government projects admitted to supplying construction material and funds for the university.

The ED further alleged that proceeds generated through illegal activities were utilised for the acquisition, construction and development of the university and associated assets.

A valuation conducted by the District Valuation Officer estimated the total cost of the university campus, including 59 buildings and land acquired through 114 sale deeds, at Rs 499.09 crore. However, the trust reportedly accounted for only Rs 78.32 crore as capital expenditure in its income tax filings.

After examining the records, the ED concluded that only Rs 72.63 crore of the campus cost could be explained through legitimate sources, leaving Rs 426.46 crore as alleged proceeds of crime.

The agency further alleged that works worth Rs 6.60 crore were executed on the university campus using MLA and MLC local area development funds, while government sanctions amounting to Rs 23.41 crore were granted for infrastructure projects on the private campus. The ED claimed that subsequent modifications to government orders resulted in public assets being transferred to the university.

Based on these findings, the ED has attached the university's land and buildings to the extent of the alleged proceeds of crime of Rs 426.46 crore.

Searches conducted at the university and related premises on August 19, 2026, resulted in the seizure of electronic devices and documents, the agency said.

Further investigation is underway.

Source: IANS

The post ED attaches Azam Khan-linked Jauhar University assets worth Rs 426.46 crore in PMLA case appeared first on Social News XYZ.

New Delhi, Oct 28 (SocialNews.XYZ) The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Wednesday withdrew its petitions seeking the transfer of cases related to the 2021 post-poll violence in West Bengal to courts outside the state, telling the Supreme Court that it no longer wished to pursue the matter in view of the changed circumstances.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the CBI, sought permission to withdraw the transfer petitions before a Bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V. Mohana.

The withdrawal comes after the CBI had earlier sought the transfer of these cases outside West Bengal, claiming that threats and intimidation of witnesses, investigating officials and lawyers were creating an atmosphere unconducive to a fair trial.

The Central agency had moved the Supreme Court during the tenure of the Mamata Banerjee-led government in West Bengal, contending that the prevailing circumstances in the state could impede the course of justice.

The Supreme Court had earlier stayed trial proceedings in the post-poll violence cases pending before various courts in West Bengal while considering the CBI's plea seeking their transfer outside the state.

At the time, Additional Solicitor General (ASG), S.V. Raju, appearing for the CBI, had submitted that officials, advocates and witnesses were being openly threatened and intimidated, thereby obstructing the course of justice.

He had also contended that no effective action appeared to have been taken by the state authorities despite the matter being brought to their notice.

The CBI had relied on a 2021 report prepared by the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC), which recommended that cases investigated by the Central agency be tried outside West Bengal.

The FIRs in these cases were registered following an order of the Calcutta High Court directing a CBI probe into post-poll violence incidents involving allegations of murder and crimes against women.

In a separate development in June last year, the Supreme Court, while cancelling the bail granted to several accused in a post-poll violence case, described the 2021 violence against BJP workers as a “dastardly offence” and said it was “nothing short of a grave attack on the roots of democracy”.

The apex court further directed the West Bengal Home Secretary and the Director General of Police to ensure adequate protection for the complainant and material witnesses so that they could depose during the trial without fear or apprehension.

Source: IANS

The post CBI withdraws pleas in SC seeking transfer of 2021 Bengal post-poll violence cases appeared first on Social News XYZ.

Kochi Oct 28 (SocialNews.XYZ) The Kerala High Court on Wednesday sought clarification from the state government on whether vigilance inquiries against public officials are covered by an exemption granted to two sections of the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (VACB) under the Right to Information (RTI) Act.

A Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Soumen Sen and Justice V.M. Syam Kumar directed the government to file an affidavit detailing the categories of information handled by the T1 and T2 sections, which were exempted through a notification issued on October 22.

The court observed that the two sections dealt with vigilance inquiries, intelligence inputs, search reports and other information relating to vigilance proceedings.

It said some of this information could be sensitive but sought specific clarification on whether inquiries against officials fell within its remit.

The matter will be considered again after three weeks.

The public interest litigation challenges the government's decision to bring the two sections under the exemption.

The petitioner contends that the VACB is primarily a criminal investigation agency that probes corruption offences involving public servants and cannot be classified as an intelligence or security organisation merely by administrative notification.

Section 24(4) of the RTI Act allows state governments to exempt specified intelligence and security organisations through notifications published in the Official Gazette.

The petitioner pointed out that the VACB was not among the eight organisations originally exempted under a government order dated February 7, 2006.

The plea alleges that VACB information officers have begun rejecting requests concerning vigilance inquiries, preliminary verifications, closure reports and sanctions for prosecution, citing the October 22 notification.

It argues that the RTI Act already provides exemptions to protect sensitive information, including material whose disclosure could impede investigations or endanger individuals.

A blanket exemption for the two sections could restrict public scrutiny of the state's anti-corruption machinery, the petitioner contends.

During the hearing, the petitioner cited a recent Supreme Court ruling in Special Police Establishment vs Kamta Prasad Mishra and Others, arguing that an agency investigating corruption cannot automatically be treated as an intelligence and security organisation under Section 24(4).

The petitioner also submitted that a similar notification had been withdrawn by the state government in 2016 after it was challenged before the High Court.

The plea seeks quashing of the October 22 notification and continued application of the RTI Act to the two sections for information not otherwise exempt under law.

The High Court has not yet ruled on the validity of the notification.

Source: IANS

The post Kerala HC seeks clarity on RTI exemption for vigilance probes appeared first on Social News XYZ.

Bhopal, Oct 28 (SocialNews.XYZ) A Public Interest Litigation has been filed before the Madhya Pradesh High Court seeking a CBI probe into the suspected shooting and death of a 19-month-old cheetah cub from Kuno National Park, with the petitioner alleging lapses in monitoring and protection of the animal outside the protected area.

The petition was filed on Wednesday by Bhopal-based wildlife activist Ajay Dubey through advocate Vinita Ahuja and Aditya Sanghi for seeking a fair, impartial and time-bound investigation into the incident.

According to the petition, the male cub, born to female cheetah Nirva at Kuno, was found seriously injured on October 26-27 in the Morena Territorial Forest Division, outside the national park's protected boundaries.

The petition notes that the State Tiger Strike Force (STF) has been deployed to investigate the incident but argues that the case raises wider concerns over the safety of cheetahs moving beyond the park and the effectiveness of existing monitoring mechanisms.

"This is not an isolated injury. If a radio-collared cheetah born in Kuno can be found with gunshot pellets in Morena forests and dies, it shows our tracking, field surveillance and anti-poaching response has collapsed outside the park. Only a CBI-led forensic probe can establish the truth," Dubey said.

The petitioner has named the Union government, the Madhya Pradesh government, the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, the National Tiger Conservation Authority and the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change as respondents.

Referring to the cheetah reintroduction programme launched at Kuno in 2022, the plea questions the adequacy of protection measures, coordination between the national park administration and territorial forest divisions, and surveillance of animals entering adjoining forest areas.

It also cites a June 27, 2025, press release issued by the Principal Chief Conservator of Forests (Wildlife) regarding the busting of an interstate gang allegedly involved in the hunting of three tigers and the seizure of 225 claws, highlighting concerns over organised wildlife crime.

Invoking Articles 48A and 51A(g) of the Constitution and Sections 9 and 50 of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, the petitioner has sought scientific examination of the pellets, veterinary findings and tracking data to establish the circumstances of the cub's death and determine responsibility for any lapses.

"We are not prejudging guilt, but prevention is as important as investigation. The court must direct a comprehensive protection and monitoring plan for cheetahs ranging beyond Kuno, including emergency response and village-level awareness, so this does not recur," Dubey said.

The PIL also seeks an independent review by senior wildlife experts not directly associated with Kuno's management, a risk assessment of adjoining areas, and a status report on the investigation and corrective measures taken.

The petitioner has stated that no delay occurred in filing the plea and that no other court has dealt with the matter. The hearing date is awaited.

Source: IANS

The post MP: PIL seeks CBI probe into suspected shooting of Kuno cheetah cub appeared first on Social News XYZ.

New Delhi, Oct 28 (SocialNews.XYZ) The Supreme Court on Wednesday directed Shiv Sena(UBT) Rajya Sabha member Sanjay Raut to appear physically before it on November 17 in a criminal contempt case over his alleged remarks against the Chief Justice of India (CJI).

A Bench of Justices Aravind Kumar and Vipul M. Pancholi also directed senior journalist Nikhil Wagle, the other proposed contemnor in the matter, to appear virtually on the next date of hearing, while observing that, if required, he could be asked to appear physically the following week.

The development comes after the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) initiated contempt proceedings against Raut and Wagle over their alleged remarks against CJI Surya Kant.

During the hearing, the Justice Kumar-led Bench was informed that Raut had filed a reply affidavit, but a copy of it was not available on record.

The apex court directed the registry to place the affidavit on record and ordered the Shiv Sena(UBT) MP to remain physically present at the next hearing.

Senior advocate Pradeep Rai, appearing for the SCBA, submitted that Raut had made further remarks and that Wagle had deleted the post only after the notice was served. He also referred to Raut’s subsequent social media posts about the burning of the Supreme Court of Albania and the possibility of something similar happening in India.

Meanwhile, senior advocate Indira Jaising, appearing for Wagle, drew the top court’s attention to his detailed affidavit, in which he tendered an unconditional apology for the controversial social media post and sought discharge of the show-cause notice.

Jaising submitted that Wagle had expressed deep regret and did not intend to justify his remarks.

Taking note of Wagle's deletion of the post and expression of remorse, the Justice Kumar-led Bench said he should appear virtually on the next date of hearing, with the possibility of physical appearance to be considered later.

On October 16, the Supreme Court issued notice to Raut and Wagle on the criminal contempt petition filed by the SCBA, asking them to show cause why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against them. At that stage, the top court had exempted them from personal appearance.

The controversy arose after Raut claimed during a media interaction on October 12 that he had seen 60 to 70 judges, including the CJI, playing badminton with BJP leaders in London.

The remarks came after the CJI declined to meet the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, and Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge, to receive a memorandum concerning the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls.

The CJI had said that convening such a meeting to discuss pending cases would run contrary to the constitutional principle of separation of powers.

The SCBA had submitted that it was pained to initiate contempt proceedings but felt that ignoring such remarks could encourage similar statements against the judiciary. The matter will now be heard on November 17 at 2 p.m.

Source: IANS

The post SC orders Sanjay Raut’s physical presence in contempt case on Nov 17 appeared first on Social News XYZ.

Jaipur, Oct 28 (SocialNews.XYZ) Self-styled godman Asaram arrived at Jodhpur Central Jail on Wednesday, hours after his parole expired. An FIR has been registered against Asaram at Jodhpur’s Ratanada police station for failing to surrender to Jodhpur Central Jail within the stipulated time after the expiry of his 20-day parole.

The case was registered under Section 58(B) of the Rajasthan Prisons Act on the basis of a written report submitted by prison guard Banwarilal.

Asaram arrived at Jodhpur Central Jail from Indore by air ambulance at around 11 p.m. on Tuesday. However, the jail authorities reportedly refused to admit him, citing prison regulations that require the admission of prisoners to be completed before sunset.

Following the denial of entry, he left the jail premises in the ambulance, while a large number of his supporters and devotees gathered outside the main gate.

The case was registered at Ratanada police station following a report from the prison administration. The authorities took action after Asaram failed to complete the surrender process within the prescribed time following the conclusion of his parole.

According to the provisions cited in the FIR, the offence carries a potential additional prison term of up to three years and a fine of up to Rs 3,000.

The case may also have implications for any future legal relief sought by Asaram, including applications for parole or bail.

The incident took place late on Tuesday night as Asaram’s 20-day parole period came to an end. He was brought from Indore to Jodhpur in an air ambulance and taken directly to Jodhpur Central Jail. However, as he reached the facility at around 11 p.m., the permitted time for prisoner admission had reportedly passed. Citing the applicable jail procedures, the prison authorities did not allow him to enter.

After the denial of entry, Asaram remained inside the ambulance as it left the jail premises, even as a large crowd of supporters had assembled outside the main gate to witness his return.

Police personnel were deployed in the area, and security arrangements were tightened to prevent any law-and-order problems.

The registration of the fresh FIR adds another legal complication for Asaram, who is serving a life sentence in a case involving the alleged rape of a minor student at a gurukul.

The precise impact will depend on the applicable legal provisions and the decisions of the competent courts, said officials.

The police and prison authorities have initiated action in connection with the alleged delay in surrendering, while the case is expected to be examined through the legal process, they added.

Source: IANS

The post Asaram arrives at Jodhpur Central Jail after parole expires; new FIR registered (LD) appeared first on Social News XYZ.

New Delhi, Oct 28 (SocialNews.XYZ) A Delhi court on Wednesday granted former Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) President Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh a final opportunity to file his response to an appeal challenging his acquittal in an alleged sexual harassment case lodged by four women wrestlers.

The Rouse Avenue Courts directed Singh to file his reply within one week, making it clear that no further opportunity would be granted for filing the response.

The appeal has been filed by four women wrestlers challenging the judgment of the trial court acquitting Singh and former WFI Assistant Secretary Vinod Tomar.

The appellants have contended that the trial court's judgment was not sustainable in law and that the evidence on record had not been correctly assessed.

The appeal also challenges Tomar's acquittal on a charge of criminal intimidation under Section 506 Part I of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), levelled by one of the complainants.

On September 28, the Rouse Avenue Court issued notice to Singh and Tomar, seeking their responses to the appeal. The matter was subsequently listed on October 9, when the court granted the respondents additional time to file their replies and fixed October 28 for further hearing.

In a judgment delivered on August 3, Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ashwini Panwar acquitted Singh and Tomar, holding that the prosecution had failed to establish the charges against them beyond a reasonable doubt.

The case dates back to January 2023, when several wrestlers, including Olympians Vinesh Phogat, Sakshi Malik and Bajrang Punia, staged a protest at Delhi's Jantar Mantar, accusing Singh of sexual harassment and intimidation.

The wrestlers had demanded Singh's resignation as WFI chief and sought the dissolution of the federation.

The controversy prompted an inquiry committee to be constituted following a complaint to the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) President, P.T. Usha. The Union Sports Ministry subsequently suspended the functioning of the WFI.

In May 2024, the Rouse Avenue Court framed charges against Singh in connection with allegations relating to sexual harassment and outraging the modesty of five women wrestlers. Singh had pleaded not guilty and opted to face trial.

The case is separate from the POCSO case registered following a complaint by a minor wrestler. In May 2025, a Delhi court accepted the Delhi Police's cancellation report after the probe agency stated that it had found no corroborative evidence to support the allegations.

Following Singh's acquittal, wrestler Vinesh Phogat and Tokyo Olympics bronze medallist Bajrang Punia expressed disappointment with the verdict and said the decision would be challenged in a higher court. Singh had welcomed the acquittal, describing it as a "victory of the junior players".

Source: IANS

The post Delhi court gives Brij Bhushan final chance to reply to wrestlers’ appeal against acquittal appeared first on Social News XYZ.

New Delhi, Oct 28 (SocialNews.XYZ) The Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) on Wednesday strongly condemned the alleged intimidation and threatening conduct of police officials towards advocates at Shahdara Police Station in Delhi, including the reported display of a revolver by a police officer to intimidate members of the legal fraternity.

In a resolution passed on Wednesday, the SCBA Executive Committee termed the alleged conduct unacceptable, and said that it posed a grave threat to the dignity, independence and safety of advocates, besides showing disrespect to the judiciary.

"The use or display of a firearm to intimidate advocates who are legitimately seeking justice cannot be tolerated in a society governed by the rule of law," the resolution stated.

Expressing solidarity with the advocates of the Delhi District Courts, the SCBA said any attempt to intimidate, threaten or obstruct lawyers in the discharge of their professional duties amounted to an attack on the independence of the legal profession and the administration of justice.

"The SCBA demands immediate and strict action against the erring officials in accordance with law," it said.

The resolution was issued by the Honourary Secretary, Pragya Baghel, on behalf of the SCBA's Executive Committee.

The Bar body reiterated that such alleged conduct must be dealt with firmly, stressing that advocates must be able to discharge their professional responsibilities without intimidation or threats.

Meanwhile, the Coordination Committee of All District Court Bar Associations of Delhi has demanded the immediate suspension of the ACP, who allegedly displayed his revolver and threatened advocates who approached the police station seeking accountability, and the concerned SHO pending an impartial inquiry.

As a mark of protest, advocates abstained from judicial work in all district courts in the national capital on Tuesday (October 27), following a unanimous resolution by the Coordination Committee.

It appealed to members of the Bar to maintain unity and solidarity, emphasising that concerns affecting the safety and dignity of advocates required serious attention from the appropriate authorities.

Source: IANS

The post SCBA backs Delhi district court lawyers, condemns police intimidation appeared first on Social News XYZ.

Kochi, Oct 28 (SocialNews.XYZ) The Kerala government on Wednesday removed Kochi City Police Commissioner Kaliraj Mahesh following the controversy over the handling of a fatal road accident involving the 17-year-old son of an Additional District Judge.

R. Nishanthini will replace Mahesh as Kochi City Police Commissioner.

The action comes amid mounting criticism over alleged police lapses in the case and demands for accountability.

The Assembly is in session, adding to the political significance of the controversy.

On Tuesday evening, the government suspended four police personnel attached to the Cheranalloor police station for alleged lapses in handling the case.

They include Circle Inspector K.S. Shyam Kumar, Station House Officer V.S. Viswajith, Grade Assistant Sub-Inspector K.T. Manoj and Senior Civil Police Officer Arun Joshi.

The suspensions followed a preliminary inquiry by ADGP P. Vijayan, who visited the accident spot, examined police records and met the victim's family.

Home Minister Ramesh Chennithala had assured the Assembly that action would be taken against officials found responsible.

The case concerns the death of Jayabalakrishnan, 55, who was riding a scooter when a Mercedes-Benz allegedly driven by a teenager hit him on Container Road at Cheranalloor early on Sunday.

The victim ran a roadside eatery.

The handling of the case triggered protests after the teenager was initially booked under provisions relating to rash driving and causing death by negligence, and later released on station bail.

The case was subsequently strengthened, and the boy's father, who owns the car, was also named as an accused.

Meanwhile, a police team conducted an inspection at the judge's flat in Aluva on Tuesday night.

Investigators examined CCTV footage and collected evidence as part of the probe.

The victim's family has decided to approach the High Court seeking further action.

The investigation has been transferred to the Crime Branch.

The government is now under pressure to ensure that the case is investigated fairly, without regard to the status of those involved.

Source: IANS

The post Kochi Police Commissioner removed amid controversy over mishandling Cheranalloor car crash case appeared first on Social News XYZ.

Jaipur, Oct 27 (SocialNews.XYZ) The Rajasthan High Court has dismissed appeals filed by the accused in the SUFA terror module case, upholding the trial court’s order to frame charges against them.

The court observed that a trial can proceed when prima facie evidence raises serious suspicion regarding alleged activities, including the procurement of explosives and involvement in a terrorist conspiracy.

A division bench comprising Chief Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal and Justice Sameer Jain dismissed the appeals, holding that the allegations and material on record warranted a trial. The court clarified that the credibility and reliability of the evidence would be examined during the proceedings.

The case dates back to March 30, 2022, when police from Nimbahera Sadar police station in Chittorgarh district recovered approximately three kilograms of explosive material from a car during a checkpoint operation at Wander Square.

Watches, batteries, wires, bulbs, and other items were also reportedly recovered from the vehicle. The National Investigation Agency (NIA) subsequently investigated the case and named 11 individuals as accused.

Eight were arrested, while three remain absconding.

Counsel representing the accused argued that several of them were not present in the vehicle when the explosives were recovered and that no incriminating materials had been seized directly from them.

The defence also questioned the evidentiary value of call detail records, location data, alleged travel tickets, and electronic evidence, arguing that these materials did not establish a direct or legally sufficient connection between the accused and the alleged crime.

The lawyers contended that the trial court had framed charges without adequate evidence and urged the High Court to discharge the accused.

Opposing the appeals, the NIA alleged that approximately 70 youths in Ratlam had formed an organisation called SUFA. According to the agency, the group sought to influence and radicalise young people by showing them videos associated with the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

The NIA further alleged that a secret meeting was held on March 25, 2022, during which a conspiracy was hatched to procure improvised explosive devices (IEDs), transport them to Jaipur, and carry out terrorist activities in the city.

According to the agency, the alleged operation was also intended to be recorded on video, and recordings linked to the conspiracy were subsequently recovered during the investigation.

The Rajasthan High Court observed that, at the stage of framing charges, a court must assess whether the available material establishes a prima facie case or creates grave suspicion against the accused.

A detailed assessment of the evidence’s authenticity, credibility, and reliability is undertaken during the trial. The bench also noted the seriousness of the allegations concerning the proposed transportation of explosive devices to a major city such as Jaipur.

By dismissing the appeals, the High Court upheld the trial court’s decision to frame charges, allowing the proceedings to continue.

The allegations against the accused will be tested through the judicial process, and the decision to frame charges does not, by itself, establish their guilt.

Source: IANS

The post SUFA terror module case: Rajasthan HC upholds charges against accused appeared first on Social News XYZ.

Thiruvananthapuram Oct 27 (SocialNews.XYZ) The Kerala Pradesh Congress Committee (KPCC) on Tuesday apologised to Chief Justice of India Surya Kant over a controversial post published on the official X account of the Kerala Congress unit.

The apology came in a reply to a legal notice issued by a Supreme Court lawyer.

KPCC president Sunny Joseph, in his reply, said the post had been published without authorisation and did not represent the official position of the Congress party.

He also said the person responsible had been removed from the position.

The post was published by Vijay Thottathil, according to the reply.

The controversy had erupted when the Kerala Congress unit's official X account carried remarks targeting the Chief Justice during a protest by the INDIA bloc.

The march to the Supreme Court was organised as part of the opposition alliance's demand for the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.

The post expressed anger over the Chief Justice's reported position that he could not meet INDIA bloc leaders because of legal issues.

It carried the provocative remark, “Surya Kant, resign. We will find a replacement for you.”

The post triggered a political and legal controversy, given that it was directed at the head of the country's judiciary.

The Kerala Congress unit subsequently withdrew it.

The latest clarification from the KPCC president, also the State Power Minister, seeks to distance the party from the remarks.

By stating that the post was unauthorised, the state Congress leadership has maintained that it was not an expression of the party's official position.

The removal of the person responsible, as stated in the reply, was also cited as part of the action taken over the incident.

The episode had placed the Congress unit in an embarrassing position at a time when the INDIA bloc was protesting against the Chief Election Commissioner.

The march was intended to focus attention on the opposition's demand for Gyanesh Kumar's resignation, but the controversial social media post shifted attention to the Congress unit's own conduct.

The KPCC's reply to the legal notice has now placed on record its claim that the post was unauthorised and its expression of regret to the Chief Justice.

Source: IANS

The post Kerala Congress apologises to CJI over ‘controversial post’ appeared first on Social News XYZ.

Guwahati, Oct 27 (SocialNews.XYZ) Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma on Tuesday said 524 people had been arrested and 441 cases registered under the ongoing crackdown on child marriage in the state, asserting that the government would not spare anyone involved in the illegal practice.

In a post on social media platform X, Sarma shared an update on the ongoing enforcement drive, stating that the figures were recorded as of 5 p.m. on Tuesday. "We will not spare anyone involved in this heinous crime and ensure that Assam is free from Child Marriage," the Chief Minister said.

The latest update comes amid the state government's renewed efforts to curb child marriage through police action and legal proceedings against those allegedly involved in facilitating or solemnising such marriages.

Sarma also shared a post highlighting that the crackdown had begun earlier than some people expected. Referring to speculation that the next phase of the operation would start in November, he indicated that enforcement action was already underway.

The Assam government has consistently maintained that child marriage poses a serious threat to the health, education and overall well-being of minors, particularly girls.

The practice can expose underage girls to early pregnancies, health complications and disruption of their education.

The latest arrests and registered cases indicate the continuation of the state's enforcement efforts against the practice. However, the government has yet to provide a detailed district-wise breakdown of the latest figures in the social media update.

The crackdown has been a significant part of the Assam government's stated campaign against child marriage, with police action targeting individuals accused of violating laws governing the minimum legal age of marriage and related offences.

The government has reiterated its commitment to eliminating child marriage in the state, with Sarma emphasising that those found involved would face action under the law.

The latest figures are expected to keep the issue in focus as the state intensifies efforts to prevent underage marriages and strengthen enforcement of existing legal safeguards.

Source: IANS

The post 524 arrested, 441 cases registered: Assam CM on child marriage crackdown appeared first on Social News XYZ.

New Delhi, Oct 27 (SocialNews.XYZ) Mokama MLA Anant Singh could face fresh legal trouble as the Supreme Court is likely to hear on October 30 a plea challenging the bail granted to him by the Patna High Court in connection with the murder of Dularchand Yadav during the 2025 Bihar Assembly elections.

The petition has been filed by Niraj Kumar, grandson of the deceased, seeking cancellation of the bail granted to Singh by the Patna High Court on March 19, 2026.

As per the case details available on the official website of the apex court, the Special Leave Petition (SLP) is pending before a Bench of Justices M.M. Sundresh and Prasanna B. Varale. The matter was last listed on September 29, when the Supreme Court deferred the hearing to October 30 after counsel for Singh sought an adjournment to file a counter-affidavit.

The apex court had made it clear that no further adjournment would be entertained.

Earlier, on July 13, the Supreme Court had issued notice on the plea after the petitioner's counsel submitted that Singh's criminal antecedents had not been duly considered by the Patna High Court while granting him bail.

Advocate Shilpi Chowdhary, appearing for the petitioner, had also submitted that Singh had not fully disclosed his 67 criminal antecedents. The apex court subsequently granted time to the respondents to file their counter-affidavit.

The case stems from the murder of Dularchand Yadav, a Jan Suraaj Party supporter and former Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) leader, on October 30, 2025, in Basawanchak village under the Ghoswari police station area of Mokama, during campaigning for the Bihar Assembly elections.

According to the police investigation, an SUV allegedly ran over Yadav, leading to his death on the spot. However, his family members alleged that he was first shot and then run over by a vehicle.

Police had identified Anant Singh as the prime accused and arrested him on the night of November 1, 2025. Two of his nephews were also arrested in connection with the case. Singh was subsequently sent to judicial custody on November 2. His earlier bail pleas had been rejected by the MP-MLA court before the Patna High Court granted him relief.

Despite being in jail, Singh contested the Mokama Assembly seat and won the election.

Meanwhile, the Janata Dal (United) expelled Singh and his wife, former MLA Neelam Devi, from the party for six years last week over alleged anti-party activities during the recent Bihar Legislative Council elections. The party cited alleged violations of its directives and Singh's decision to oppose JD(U) candidate Neeraj Kumar in the Patna Graduates' constituency election and campaign for Anuj Singh, a candidate associated with Jan Suraaj.

The JD(U) has also written to the Speaker of the Bihar Legislative Assembly seeking action against Singh's membership under the Tenth Schedule of the Constitution, which deals with disqualification on grounds of defection.

Source: IANS

The post Dularchand Yadav murder case: SC to hear plea against Anant Singh’s bail on Oct 30 appeared first on Social News XYZ.

Bhopal, Oct 27 (SocialNews.XYZ) The Commissioner of Police, Bhopal, has imposed a strict ban on the manufacture, sale, storage and use of illegal improvised firework devices, including ‘carbide guns’, ‘carbide cannons’ and ‘carbide lamps’, in the interest of public safety during the forthcoming Diwali festival.

In an order issued under Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the police chief prohibited the unauthorised manufacture, procurement, distribution, repair, assembly, purchase, sale, display for sale, storage, import or commercial availability of any prohibited firecrackers or pyrotechnic devices.

The ban specifically covers devices made from iron, steel or PVC pipes filled with explosive substances designed to produce loud explosive sounds.

In the last few years, several people reported damage to their eyes -- to an irreversible extent, in Bhopal and nearby districts of Vidisha, Sagar and Sehore after use of "Carbide Guns."

The order notes that such illegal devices pose a significant risk of severe injuries, illnesses, fires, explosions and damage to public and private property. Their use in crowded markets, residential areas, public thoroughfares and near schools creates a grave danger to human life and health.

The manufacture and handling of these items involve improper use of flammable gases, calcium carbide and other hazardous materials that can easily lead to untoward incidents.

“As in previous years, ensuring public peace, public safety and the protection of the lives and health of citizens during Diwali and other festivals remains a primary responsibility of the administration,” the order said.

The prohibition will remain in force for two months from the date of issuance. Any person affected by the order may approach the Commissioner of Police seeking relief or modification.

Violation of the order, or any part of it, will constitute a punishable offence under Section 223 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in addition to other applicable laws, the order said.

Authorities have urged citizens to refrain from using or dealing in such dangerous devices and to report any violations to help maintain law and order in the city during the festive season.

Source: IANS

The post MP: ‘Carbide Guns’, illegal firecrackers banned ahead of Diwali appeared first on Social News XYZ.

Kolkata, Oct 27 (SocialNews.XYZ) Two Bangladeshi women were arrested on Tuesday for illegally entering India from Bangladesh and boarding a long-distance train to Keralam.

The Railway Police conducted a joint operation at the New Jalpaiguri (NJP) station in north Bengal's Siliguri and arrested them.

Police said that the names of the arrested are Rabia Akhtar and Shiuli Akhtar. Both are residents of Narayanganj district of Bangladesh.

According to Railway Police sources, based on information received through sources, the Special Operation Group of Siliguri GRP and NJP GRP jointly conducted a search operation in the general compartment of a long-distance train bound for Bengaluru at NJP station.

At that time, the two women were arrested from the train.

Later, when they were brought to the Siliguri GRP police station for questioning, they could not show any valid documents to enter India. The police finally arrested them as they did not have valid documents.

Initial investigation and interrogation revealed that after illegally entering India through the Indo-Bangladesh border in Meghalaya, the two women first went to Assam to leave for Keralam. They took a train from Kamakhya in Assam.

However, it is still unclear why or with whose help they entered India and what was the main motive behind going to Keralam. The investigating officers are probing whether there is any major smuggling ring or any other international link behind this.

Regarding the incident, Deputy Superintendent of Railway Police, Anupam Majumdar, said that the two Bangladeshi women were arrested after a raid at NJP station on a tip-off.

"No valid documents related to their stay or entry into India were found with them. An investigation has been started along with interrogation to find out the purpose for which they entered India and were going to Keralam," said the officer.

Police sources said that the arrested women are being questioned to find out whether anyone else has entered the country illegally along with them and who had helped them gain entry to the country.

Source: IANS

The post Bengal: Two Bangladeshi women arrested for illegally entering India appeared first on Social News XYZ.

New Delhi, Oct 27 (SocialNews.XYZ) The Supreme Court on Tuesday questioned the Centre over its decision to cap trade margins on anti-cancer medicines at 30 per cent, asking why the government had taken so long to act on the issue and expressing concern over the substantial mark-ups charged by private hospitals on medicines and medical consumables.

A Bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta said the issue concerned patients’ lives and could not be viewed merely through the prism of commercial interests and economic policy. “Why did you suddenly decide to cap the trade margin on cancer medicines at 30 per cent? Why were you silent for so many years? Do not force us to ask harsh questions. You are dealing with matters concerning people’s lives. Do not treat this as a business,” the Justice Nath-led Bench told the Centre.

The apex court made the observations while hearing public interest litigations (PILs) concerning the regulation of medicine prices, generic medicines, medical devices and prescription practices.

The apex court expressed dissatisfaction with the Centre’s explanation that the decision to cap trade margins was aimed at balancing the interests of various stakeholders. It also questioned the burden placed on patients when government-backed health schemes like Ayushman Bharat provide reimbursement only up to a specified limit, observing that the additional expenditure ultimately had to be borne by patients themselves.

It further raised concerns over the substantial mark-ups charged by hospitals on medical consumables, citing the example of a saline drip line that costs a retailer around Rs 15 but is billed to patients at Rs 250. “Why is the DPCO in place if this is what is happening? The government itself is allowing this to happen,” the Supreme Court observed, referring to the Drug Price Control Order (DPCO), which provides the regulatory framework for controlling drug prices.

The Justice Nath-led Bench also referred to an incident involving a drug dealer whose wife was undergoing cancer treatment at a prominent private hospital. It said the dealer had informed the hospital that he could procure a chemotherapy injection at a dealer price of Rs 11,000, but the hospital refused to administer the medicine and instead charged Rs 1.30 lakh for the same injection.

“Can you show any justification for this loot, please? Why this difference? Where does the money go?” the Supreme Court asked.

Appearing for the private hospitals, senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi argued that hospitals needed to procure medicines through their own pharmacies to ensure the availability and quality of drugs administered to patients. The senior counsel submitted that hospitals had to maintain infrastructure and facilities round the clock and that medicines available in the market could not always be trusted to be genuine.

Rohatgi also contended that reducing medicine prices would not necessarily bring down the overall cost of treatment, as hospitals would have to recover their operational expenses through other means.

However, the Justice Nath-led Bench rejected the justification, observing that hospitals could recover their costs through legitimate means rather than imposing excessive mark-ups on medicines. “A hospital can survive through other means, not through this dacoity. You are a commercial hospital. You charge for everything. But why should a medicine be quoted at 100 or 200 times its price?” the apex court asked.

The Centre had earlier informed the Supreme Court that capping trade margins on anti-cancer medicines at 30 per cent of their maximum retail price (MRP) was expected to save patients around Rs 2,500 crore annually.

In an affidavit filed before the top court, the Department of Pharmaceuticals said the proposed measure could reduce the MRP of cancer medicines by 20 to 70 per cent, depending on the drug. The government had said the move was intended to curb excessive trade mark-ups while retaining reasonable margins for distributors and retailers.

It had also referred to an earlier intervention in 2019, when the National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority (NPPA) imposed a 30 per cent trade margin cap on 42 selected non-scheduled anti-cancer medicines.

According to the Centre, the measure led to reductions in the MRP of 526 brands and generated estimated annual savings of around Rs 984 crore for patients.

The Supreme Court has now concluded the hearing and reserved its verdict in the matter. It has also directed all parties to file their written submissions.

The PILs have raised concerns over the existing medicine pricing framework and sought more effective regulation of the disparity between the prices at which medicines are supplied to retailers and the amounts ultimately charged to patients.

Source: IANS

The post SC questions Centre’s delay in regulating cancer drug margins, reserves verdict on medicine pricing appeared first on Social News XYZ.

New Delhi, Oct 27 (SocialNews.XYZ) The Supreme Court on Tuesday stayed the operation of a Madras High Court order directing the Union government to take custody of international antique dealer Subhash Chandra Kapoor from prison in Tamil Nadu and initiate steps for his return to Germany.

A Bench of Justices B.V. Nagarathna and R. Mahadevan passed the interim order while hearing a special leave petition (SLP) challenging the judgment of the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, which had held that Kapoor’s continued detention in India was illegal in the absence of Germany’s consent to his prosecution in other criminal cases.

In its September 8 order, the High Court had directed the Union government to take custody of Kapoor within two weeks and proceed in accordance with law to facilitate his return to Germany.

Kapoor, an American citizen and international antiquities dealer, was extradited from Germany to India on July 13, 2012, in connection with an idol theft case registered by the Udayarpalayam police in Tamil Nadu's Ariyalur district in 2008.

He was subsequently convicted and sentenced to 10 years' imprisonment in the case and has completed the sentence. However, Kapoor continued to remain in custody in connection with other pending cases involving the alleged theft of antique idols from temples in Tamil Nadu.

Allowing his habeas corpus petition, the Madras High Court had held that his continued detention could not be sustained without the consent of Germany, as required under the Extradition Act, 1962, and the India-Germany Extradition Treaty.

"The Rule of Speciality cannot be observed in form and defeated in substance," a Division Bench of Justices A.D. Jagadish Chandira and N. Gunasekaran had observed, adding that Kapoor's liberty could not be withheld based on the possibility that consent might be obtained at a future date.

The High Court had further held that the seriousness of the allegations against Kapoor could not override the legal requirements governing his extradition and continued detention.

"The gravity or heinous nature of an alleged offence cannot, by itself, create a legal authority for detention where the rule of speciality otherwise requires the consent of the requested State," it had said.

Source: IANS

The post SC stays Madras HC order directing return of antique idol dealer Subhash Kapoor to Germany appeared first on Social News XYZ.

Kolkata, Oct 27 (SocialNews.XYZ) Hours after the encounter killing of Prahlad Das, an accused in the rape and murder of a minor girl at Gaighata in North 24 Parganas district, another accused was killed in a police encounter in West Bengal on Tuesday, this time in Murshidabad's Samserganj area, officials said.

The deceased has been identified as Samiul Sheikh, one of the accused in the murder of local BJP leader Sujit Mondal. Sheikh was in the custody of the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) of the West Bengal police.

According to police, Sheikh was taken by the CID to the crime scene on Tuesday afternoon as part of the investigation and for the reconstruction of events related to the murder case. The accused reportedly snatched the firearm from an escorting CID officer and fired at the police personnel, officials said.

The CID officers retaliated, leaving Sheikh critically injured. He was rushed to Jangipur Sub-Divisional Hospital, where doctors declared him dead.

“The state CID was investigating the murder of Sujit Mondal. On Tuesday, the accused Samiul Sheikh was taken to the spot to reconstruct the crime scene. At that time, a gun battle took place. After that, the accused was taken to the hospital, where the doctors declared him dead,” said an officer from Jangipur Police District in Murshidabad.

Sujit Mondal, a local BJP leader and a resident of the Old Dakbanglo area of Samserganj, mysteriously disappeared on August 28 this year. His dismembered body was later recovered. Chief Minister Suvendu Adhikari had then said that Mondal was killed with a meat-cutting knife.

The police later arrested the three accused, namely Samiul Sheikh, Tajkira Bibi and Johnny Sheikh.

The murder case also sparked allegations of police negligence. Mondal's wife, Sumana Mondal, alleged that despite repeatedly approaching the local police station after her husband's disappearance, she received no assistance.

The incident led to disciplinary action against several police officials, including suspensions, transfers and departmental inquiries.

The Chief Minister then termed it a 'major blunder'.

With Sheikh's death on Tuesday, West Bengal witnessed two separate police encounter killings involving accused persons on the same day on Tuesday.

Source: IANS

The post After Gaighata, Samserganj sees second encounter killing in Bengal on same day appeared first on Social News XYZ.

New Delhi, Oct 27 (SocialNews.XYZ) Trinamool Congress (TMC) MP Mahua Moitra on Tuesday agreed before the Delhi High Court to remove a social media post in which she referred to BJP MP Nishikant Dubey as a “fake degree kism ke aadmi” (man with a fake degree), while former Finance Secretary Subhash Chandra Garg said he would request a podcaster to block a portion of a video containing a controversial remark against the BJP leader.

A single-judge Bench of Justice Tushar Rao Gedela was hearing a defamation suit filed by Dubey against Moitra and Garg over their alleged defamatory remarks against him.

During the hearing, Moitra’s counsel told the High Court that she would remove the disputed tweet but would retain her right to question Dubey’s educational qualifications. The counsel submitted that the dispute between Moitra and Dubey was political in nature and argued that Dubey should establish that his degree was genuine to counter her allegation.

However, Justice Gedela asked the counsel to obtain instructions on removing the social media post, objecting to the use of the term ‘blackmailer’ against Dubey and warning that the High Court would otherwise pass an appropriate order.

Later, the High Court was informed that the podcast featuring Garg’s remarks had been published by another person and that the former bureaucrat would request the podcaster to block the controversial portion.

Moitra’s counsel told the single-judge Bench that she would remove the tweet referring to Dubey as a “fake degree kism ke aadmi”.

The controversy involving Garg arose after he referred to an alleged meeting with Dubey during his tenure in the Finance Ministry and claimed that the BJP MP had approached him regarding certain matters.

Dubey rejected the allegation, maintaining that he had never visited the office of any Central government secretary since being elected to Parliament in 2009 and had not written any recommendation seeking the transfer or posting of an official.

The two had also engaged in a war of words over India's first-quarter GDP growth rate of 7.8 per cent, with Garg questioning the figures and changes in the methodology used for earlier GDP calculations, prompting a sharp response from Dubey.

Garg served as Secretary, Department of Economic Affairs, from July 2017 to July 2019 and briefly held the position of Finance Secretary between March and June 2019.

Source: IANS

The post Mahua Moitra agrees to delete defamatory post against Nishikant Dubey in Delhi HC appeared first on Social News XYZ.

Ranchi, Oct 27 (SocialNews.XYZ) A shooter associated with Jharkhand’s notorious Rahul Singh gang was injured in an encounter with the police in Ranchi's Nayasarai area on Tuesday, officials said.

The shooter, along with an associate, was arrested after the gunfight.

The exchange of fire took place near the railway line in the Nayasarai locality under the Assembly police station limits. The injured accused, identified as Shahid, sustained a bullet injury to his leg during the operation and was admitted to the Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS) for treatment.

Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) Rakesh Ranjan said the gang had been under police surveillance following a recent firing incident near a petrol pump on Ring Road in the Kanke police station area, in which members of the Rahul Singh gang were involved.

According to the SSP, police received specific intelligence that Shahid, a shooter associated with the gang, was heading towards the Assembly area from Daladali Chowk on a motorcycle along with an accomplice to carry out a major criminal act. Acting on the tip-off, a special police team laid a trap and cordoned off the Nayasarai area.

As the suspects found themselves surrounded from all sides, they opened indiscriminate fire at the police team. The police retaliated in self-defence, during which Shahid was hit by a bullet in the leg. Despite being injured, he attempted to flee but was chased down and nabbed along with his associate.

Police recovered a country-made pistol and two live cartridges from the spot.

Preliminary investigation revealed that Shahid is a resident of Lohardaga district and is suspected to have been involved in several serious criminal incidents in Ranchi and neighbouring districts.

Police suspect his involvement in the firing at the Kanke petrol pump, a robbery case in Bero, and a shooting incident at the Shivaliya Construction site associated with the Bharatmala Project in Gumla district.

Following the encounter, Ranchi police launched a search operation across various parts of the city to track down other members of the gang, officials said.

Source: IANS

The post Jharkhand’s Rahul Singh gang shooter injured in police encounter in Ranchi, two held appeared first on Social News XYZ.

Kochi, Oct 27 (SocialNews.XYZ) Four Kerala Police personnel have been suspended for lapses in the investigation into the fatal Cheranalloor road accident caused by the 17-year-old son of an Additional Sessions Judge driving a luxury vehicle, following widespread criticism and protests over the handling of the case in which an elderly man lost his life.

The suspension came hours after the ADGP of Police, P. Vijayan, arrived here and inspected the accident site, then went to the house of the deceased and held consultations with the probe team.

Those suspended are CI Shyam Kumar, Station House Officer Viswajith, Grade SI Manoj and Civil Police Officer Arunjith.

The action comes after Home Minister Ramesh Chennithala on Tuesday admitted in the Kerala Assembly that the police had made mistakes in investigating the accident.

The crash occurred at around 2.20 a.m. on October 25 on Container Road in Cheranalloor, near Kochi. Jayabalakrishnan, 55, was returning home after closing his roadside eatery when the Mercedes-Benz, allegedly driven by the judge's minor son, hit his scooter.

The police initially registered a case of rash driving and causing death by negligence under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).

Section 105 of the BNS, dealing with culpable homicide not amounting to murder, was subsequently added.

The Kochi City Police have also booked the Additional Sessions Judge, who is posted at a court in Irinjalakuda in Thrissur district, as an accused under Section 199A of the Motor Vehicles Act.

He is the registered owner of the car involved in the accident.

The provision holds a vehicle owner or guardian accountable when a minor commits a motor vehicle offence, subject to statutory exceptions.

Police have said the proceedings against the judicial officer are being carried out in accordance with Supreme Court guidelines.

The District Judiciary and the Kerala High Court would also be informed.

The victim's family and several political and youth organisations had demanded action, questioning the handling of the case and calling for accountability.

The Juvenile Justice Board in Ernakulam granted bail to the 17-year-old on Monday.

The suspension of the four police personnel follows mounting pressure for a proper investigation and action against those responsible for any lapses.

The case has drawn considerable public attention, with questions being raised over police accountability and the application of the law when a fatal accident involves the family of a judicial officer or an influential person.

Source: IANS

The post 4 cops suspended over lax probe into fatal accident by Kerala judge’s minor son driving Mercedes appeared first on Social News XYZ.

Guwahati, Oct 27 (SocialNews.XYZ) The primary accused in the fatal shooting at Hotel Bilas Inn in Guwahati that claimed at least five lives had reportedly faced a police complaint in Assam’s Jorhat district in June 2024 over allegations involving a false identity and an attempt to take control of a business establishment, police said on Tuesday.

According to information available, an FIR was lodged at Pulibor Police Station on June 12, 2024, alleging that the accused Ghanakanta Gogoi had misrepresented his identity and claimed to be a resident of Jorhat.

The complaint reportedly accused him and a group accompanying him of arriving armed at a business premises and assaulting several people.

The allegations in the earlier case have not been independently verified. Details regarding the subsequent investigation, any charges filed, or the outcome of the proceedings were not immediately available.

The reported complaint has brought Gogoi’s background under renewed scrutiny as police investigate the October 26 shooting at Hotel Bilas Inn, located near Bora Service on Guwahati’s GS Road.

Questions have also emerged over his residential details. Gogoi reportedly presented himself as a resident of Zoo Road in Guwahati but was said to have been staying with his family in rented accommodation in Saukuchi since October 6. These details require confirmation from official records.

The shooting occurred at around 9 p.m. on Monday, reportedly during a dispute over the hotel’s lease agreement. The five deceased were identified as Helena Bharali, her son Debarshi Ishan Kashyap, Debarshi’s wife Rinika, Helena’s brother Bhudev Bharali, and Narayan Das, reportedly Bhudev’s caretaker.

Satyendra Pathak, a driver who sustained gunshot injuries, was taken to Gauhati Medical College and Hospital for treatment.

According to Guwahati Police Commissioner Partha Sarathi Mahanta, Gogoi was arrested within an hour of the incident. Police also seized a .32-calibre pistol allegedly used in the shooting. Police are examining the circumstances surrounding the hotel’s lease, which had reportedly expired, as well as discussions over its renewal.

Allegations of unpaid rent and outstanding electricity dues have also emerged in reports concerning the dispute. The earlier Jorhat complaint could provide investigators with an additional lead in establishing Gogoi’s background and previous activities.

However, the allegations remain subject to verification, and the investigation into the Guwahati killings is continuing.

Source: IANS

The post Assam hotel shooting: Accused faced false identity charges earlier appeared first on Social News XYZ.

Mumbai, Oct 27 (SocialNews.XYZ) Bollywood actor Imran Khan secured interim relief from the Bombay High Court on Tuesday after it stayed the implementation of a 'Leave India' notice issued against him by the Centre.

A division bench of the High Court, hearing Khan's petition challenging the notice, directed that no coercive action be taken against him until the next hearing.

The court also stayed the operation of the impugned notice, which had required the actor to leave India by October 28.

During the hearing, the Additional Solicitor General (ASG), appearing for the Centre, sought time and requested that the matter be adjourned until next week.

The ASG also gave a verbal assurance to the court that no punitive action would be initiated against Khan in the meantime.

Taking note of the submissions, the court scheduled the next hearing for November 2 at 3 p.m. and granted interim protection to the actor by keeping the notice in abeyance until then.

The controversy stems from a notice issued to Khan following his participation in a protest demanding the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. Authorities alleged that Khan violated provisions of the Foreigners Act by taking part in a political demonstration despite not being an Indian citizen.

Khan, however, challenged the action before the High Court, arguing that the order was arbitrary and violated principles of natural justice. In his petition, he contended that he was given only 14 days to leave the country without any prior inquiry, show-cause notice, or opportunity to present his case.

The petition further stated that the protest was held at a location that was not designated as a restricted area and that Khan had not breached any barricades or violated any law during the demonstration.

According to his plea, he was in the process of leaving the venue when he was suddenly surrounded by members of the media and subsequently detained.

The Foreigners Regional Registration Office (FRRO), in its order, accused Khan of violating the Foreigners Act by participating in the protest despite holding Overseas Citizen of India (OCI) status rather than Indian citizenship.

Source: IANS

The post Actor Imran Khan gets major relief as Bombay HC stays ‘Leave India’ notice appeared first on Social News XYZ.

Jaipur, Oct 27 (SocialNews.XYZ) The Supreme Court has rejected Asaram’s plea seeking an extension of his medical parole, directing him to surrender upon the expiry of the existing period. He must surrender by 5 p.m. on Tuesday.

Asaram is serving a life sentence in a 2013 rape case involving a minor in Rajasthan. He was convicted by a POCSO court in Jodhpur and sentenced to life imprisonment for raping a teen girl in his ashram. He is serving a life sentence in Central Jail, Jodhpur.

The Rajasthan High Court had granted him 20 days of parole on October 6, which now expires.

His counsel approached the Supreme Court, seeking an extension on medical grounds. According to the plea, Asaram is undergoing treatment at the Government Dhanwantari Ayurvedic Hospital in Ujjain, Madhya Pradesh.

His counsel argued that his treatment was continuing and requested additional time on medical grounds.

The Supreme Court declined to extend the parole period. However, it directed the Rajasthan government to ensure that Asaram’s medical needs were adequately addressed.

The Supreme Court rejected Asaram’s plea seeking an extension of his medical parole, directing him to surrender by 5 p.m. on Tuesday as his parole has already expired.

Significantly, the Supreme Court will hear his appeal against conviction on November 6 after parole ends on October 27.

The Supreme Court has directed its Registry to summon the trial court records, in both physical and digital form, in the appeal filed by Asaram against his conviction for sexually assaulting the minor devotee in Jodhpur in 2013. The Court listed the matter for further hearing on November 6 at 2 p.m.

Earlier, the Gujarat High Court had rejected an interim bail plea of the self-styled godman, who had sought 20 days of temporary release on humanitarian grounds to meet his 83-year-old wife, who is undergoing treatment at a hospital. However, the court allowed him to seek permission to speak to her through video conferencing.

Asaram was convicted by a trial court in Gujarat for raping a woman disciple on several occasions at his Surat ashram in 2013.

Source: IANS

The post Supreme Court rejects Asaram’s plea for parole extension appeared first on Social News XYZ.

Kalol (Gujarat), Oct 27 (SocialNews.XYZ) A sessions court in Gujarat’s Kalol has sentenced three men to rigorous life imprisonment for cow slaughter and attempting to sell the meat, after 277 kg of beef worth Rs 55,000 was seized during a police raid in August 2024.

The court also imposed a fine of Rs two lakh on each convict.

Additional Sessions Judge B R Rajput found Wasim Qureshi of Juhapura, Mahmad Rafiq Qureshi of Behrampura and Asfaq Bahelim of Fatehwadi guilty under the Gujarat Animal Preservation (Amendment) Act and the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act.

According to Additional Public Prosecutor Jignesh Joshi, the police had arrested six people in connection with the case. On August 22, 2024, they raided the house of Lalabhai Senma in Jamla village and seized 277 kg of beef, valued at Rs 55,000, from the three men.

Weapons allegedly used for cow slaughter and a vehicle used to transport the meat were also recovered. The investigation revealed that the accused planned to sell the meat to Ghulam Moin Qureshi.

After the trial, the court convicted three of the six accused.

While pronouncing the sentence, Judge Rajput referred to ancient Sanskrit texts and the Vedas to underline the cultural significance of cow protection.

“The cow is considered the mother of the universe. It is useful for human life and society. Protecting cows is an act associated with religion and compassion. Wherever cow slaughter takes place, legal action should be taken. If the guilt of the accused is established by the evidence, appropriate punishment should be awarded to them,” the court observed.

In its judgment, the court noted that the convicts had slaughtered a cow and attempted to sell its meat despite being aware of the animal’s cultural significance.

It further observed that failure to impose the prescribed punishment could threaten the existence of cows.

The court subsequently sentenced the three men to rigorous life imprisonment and imposed the fines.

Source: IANS

The post Gujarat court sentences three to life imprisonment in cow slaughter case appeared first on Social News XYZ.

New Delhi, Oct 27 (SocialNews.XYZ) The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) has issued an advisory on women's safety at workplaces and in public spaces, calling for measures across eight key areas and seeking reports on the progress of their implementation within two months.

The advisory, titled ‘Women’s Safety at Work and Public Spaces’, has been sent to the Secretaries of 10 Union Ministries, the Chairperson of the Railway Board and the Chief Secretaries/Administrators of all states and Union Territories (UTs).

The apex human rights body observed that despite the existence of stringent laws to protect women's rights, their safety at workplaces and public spaces remains a concern.

As per the recent Periodic Labour Force Participation Survey in India, women's participation in the labour force stood at 34.6 per cent in September 2026. However, about 4.4 lakh cases of crimes against women were also reported, according to the latest National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB) report published in 2026.

These figures underscore the persistent challenges in ensuring the safety and security of women and highlight the need for sustained and concerted efforts, the NHRC said.

It observed that women's safety is vital to ensuring their constitutional entitlement to justice and equal opportunities. It further observed that safety at workplaces and public spaces is an essential condition for enabling women to participate fully in the workforce and realise their full potential.

The advisory focusses on eight key areas for action, including raising awareness about women's safety and sexual harassment, infrastructure, encouraging bystander intervention, the role of the police, survivor support, cybercrime against women, long-term reforms and other measures.

The Union Ministries to which the advisory has been issued include Women and Child Development, Education, Home Affairs, Information and Broadcasting, Labour and Employment, Corporate Affairs, Road Transport and Highways, Housing and Urban Affairs, and Health and Family Welfare.

The NHRC has urged all authorities concerned to implement the recommendations contained in the advisory and furnish an Action Taken Report (ATR) within two months, informing it about the progress made.

Source: IANS

The post NHRC issues advisory, asks Centre, states to act on women’s safety at work, public spaces appeared first on Social News XYZ.

Ranchi, Oct 27 (SocialNews.XYZ) A special court in Ranchi on Tuesday cleared the way for the trial of 12 accused, including former JPSC Chairman L. Khiangte and former Deputy Examination Controller Shweta Kumari Gupta, in a high profile Jharkhand Public Service Commission (JPSC) exam scam.

The court took cognisance of a 97-page charge sheet filed by the CID after the state government granted the prosecution sanction to go ahead.

The next hearing has been fixed on November 10.

The other accused include Ramveer Singh, Director of private examination agency TDPL; its Marketing Manager and alleged mastermind Abhay Kumar Tiwari; agency employees Mohammed Usman and Mohammed Ebad; and Hemant Kumar Verma, Pradeep Kumar Singh, Sanjay Kumar, Suman Saurabh and Arvind Kumar.

All 12 accused were arrested in July and August this year and remain in judicial custody after their bail pleas were rejected.

They were produced before the special court through video conferencing from Birsa Munda Central Jail in Hotwar on Tuesday.

According to the charge sheet and case diary submitted before the court, the CID has uncovered what it describes as a well-organised examination racket.

Based on digital evidence, forensic reports and call detail records, investigators have alleged that candidates were charged around Rs 5 lakh for clearing the preliminary examination, while guarantees of final selection fetched between Rs 10 lakh and Rs 25 lakh.

The probe further alleges that former JPSC Chairman L. Khiangte used the serial numbers of Rs 10 currency notes as a code for financial transactions linked to the scam.

Investigators have also claimed that contracts were awarded to blacklisted companies without tendering in return for Rs 2 crore in cash and a 10 per cent commission on total billings.

Evidence collected during the investigation reportedly includes travel records and mobile-location data indicating delivery of Rs 2.5 lakh in cash to Khiangte's residence in Aizawl, Mizoram.

CID investigators said searches conducted at the former chairman's office and among his personal belongings led to the recovery of a confidential list of 15 successful candidates and eight original admit cards of Forest Range Officer main examination candidates. Ten of those candidates were allegedly selected later.

One of the most significant findings cited in the charge sheet concerns the alleged leakage of confidential examination data.

Investigators claim that before the official declaration of the results of the 14th JPSC preliminary examination, former Deputy Examination Controller Shweta Kumari Gupta shared sensitive information and the complete database of selected candidates with TDPL employee Mohammed Usman via WhatsApp.

Technical analysis of chat records allegedly revealed that data relating to 267 selected candidates had been shared in advance. Of these, 146 candidates were from Bihar, 82 from Uttar Pradesh and 14 from Haryana.

Information related to main examination questions, answers, and category-wise cut-off marks was also allegedly leaked before official publication.

The charge sheet further states that alleged mastermind Abhay Kumar Tiwari had leased an entire hotel near Ranchi railway station for 11 months. The premises were allegedly used as a secret operational hub where ineligible candidates were accommodated, and arrangements were made for manipulating OMR sheets.

Investigators said recovery of unsealed original OMR sheets and their videography from the strong room pointed to deliberate weakening of security protocols.

The CID has also alleged that shortly before his arrest, Khiangte attempted to destroy digital evidence by formatting his mobile phone and damaging his laptop. These allegations form part of the evidence cited in the charge sheet now before the court.

Source: IANS

The post JPSC exam scam: Ranchi court clears way for trial of 12 accused including ex-chairman Khiangte appeared first on Social News XYZ.

New Delhi, Oct 27 (SocialNews.XYZ) Former Union Law Minister Ashwani Kumar on Tuesday said that the Supreme Court must decide whether the Election Commission of India (ECI) took its decisions unanimously, following the poll body's submission of an affidavit clarifying its decision-making process before the apex court.

Kumar's remarks came after the ECI informed the Supreme Court that there had been no change to Form 6, the statutory document prescribed for the inclusion of names in electoral rolls. The poll panel rejected allegations that it had amended the form through its orders issued for the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise.

In a counter-affidavit filed before the Supreme Court, the ECI described as misleading the allegation that it had amended Form 6 through its SIR orders dated June 24, 2025, October 27, 2025, and May 14, 2026. The poll body clarified that the declaration required under the SIR orders is a separate document and does not constitute a part of Form 6, which can be amended only by the Central Government.

Speaking to IANS, Ashwani Kumar said the affidavit filed by the Election Commission was significant because the central issue behind the ongoing agitation concerned allegations that Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar had taken decisions independently rather than in consultation with the other Election Commissioners.

"The Election Commission's affidavit is very important because the main issue over which the agitation is taking place is that the Chief Election Commissioner used to take decisions on his own and not in consultation with others. Regarding this, the affidavit filed in the Supreme Court now clearly states that all decisions were ultimately taken unanimously," Kumar said.

He said the Supreme Court would now have to examine the implications of the ECI's submission that its decisions were unanimous, particularly in light of the objections reportedly raised by the two Election Commissioners at an earlier stage.

"The Supreme Court now has to decide whether, if the decisions were unanimous, it should be understood that the objections raised by both Election Commissioners at one stage were withdrawn by them or were not considered valid. The Supreme Court is yet to decide this," he said.

Kumar also addressed the controversy surrounding Form 6 and the additional information sought from applicants during the SIR exercise. He said the ECI's affidavit maintained that no changes had been made to the prescribed statutory form, while acknowledging that a separate declaration form had been introduced to seek additional information.

"As far as Form 6 is concerned, the Election Commission's affidavit states that, according to the report, no changes were made. However, it is also true that additional information was sought in a declaration form by the CEC or an Election Commissioner, apart from Form 6. The Supreme Court will now have to decide whether the additional information sought actually changes Form 6 in the true sense," Kumar added.

Source: IANS

The post SIR row: SC must decide whether decisions were unanimous, says ex-Law Minister appeared first on Social News XYZ.

New Delhi, Oct 27 (SocialNews.XYZ) The Supreme Court on Tuesday issued notice to the Centre on a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking a uniform protocol for the protection of women police personnel deployed for public-order duties and the management of protests across the country.

A Bench of Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V. Mohana issued notice on the petition filed by advocate Ashish Gopal Garg and tagged it with a pending clutch of petitions, with the matter listed for further hearing on November 3.

The petition, filed through advocate-on-record (AoR) Shweta Garg, has sought directions to the Centre to frame a comprehensive framework for ensuring the safety of women police personnel during protest deployments, preserving and authenticating electronic evidence, including AI-generated material, and ensuring an independent examination of allegations of misconduct by police personnel and violence against them.

The plea raises concerns over incidents during recent protests in Delhi linked to the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls and demands concerning the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar.

It refers to allegations of violence against police personnel, including women officers and constables, as well as the circulation of digitally manipulated material on social media. The petitioner has contended that women police personnel are repeatedly deployed in crowded and volatile situations where they face risks with a specific gender dimension. It has also highlighted the possibility of fabricated or manipulated digital material being circulated as evidence before investigating agencies or courts could, independently, examine its authenticity.

The petition states that the constitutional framework requires both the protection of peaceful assemblies and action in accordance with law against violence, unlawful use of force and sexual misconduct, based on an objective assessment of reliable evidence.

The petitioner has argued that there is no published protocol uniformly addressing the safety of women police personnel during protest deployments, the reporting and redressal of sexual harassment in the field, the independent examination of complaints against police personnel and the preservation and authentication of electronic evidence relating to protests.

The plea has sought the framing of a Women Police Personnel Protection and Protest Management Protocol, along with directions for preserving CCTV footage, body-worn camera recordings, control-room footage and other relevant electronic evidence.

It has also sought a framework for the forensic authentication of disputed digital material, an effective complaint mechanism for women police personnel and the independent examination of allegations against police personnel.

Source: IANS

The post SC issues notice on plea seeking protocol to protect women police personnel during protests appeared first on Social News XYZ.

New Delhi, Oct 27 (SocialNews.XYZ) The Supreme Court on Tuesday deferred the hearing on a plea filed by Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi and other INDIA bloc leaders challenging the Election Commission of India's (ECI) Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls.

The Bench of Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V. Mohana directed the petitioners to file their response to the ECI's affidavit within 10 days.

It also granted the poll panel the liberty to file an additional affidavit, if required, within the same period.

The matter will be taken up after the Diwali vacation.

The plea, filed by Rahul Gandhi and 12 other Opposition leaders, alleges large-scale voter deletions and irregularities in the SIR exercise.

The petitioners have challenged the manner in which the electoral roll revision is being conducted.

The respondents in the matter include the ECI, Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar and Election Commissioners Sukhbir Singh Sandhu and Vivek Joshi.

The Supreme Court had issued notice to the poll panel on October 15 and directed that the petition be tagged with other pleas already pending before it, challenging the validity of the SIR exercise in various states.

The CJI Kant-led Bench had also indicated that it would examine the conduct of one of the petitioners at the next hearing, later clarifying that the petition filed on behalf of Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut would be entertained provisionally, subject to his explaining his conduct.

The direction followed controversy over Raut's remarks concerning CJI Surya Kant after the latter declined to meet Rahul Gandhi and Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge to receive a memorandum on the SIR exercise.

The CJI had observed that holding a meeting to discuss pending cases would be contrary to the constitutional principle of separation of powers.

Meanwhile, the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) has filed a criminal contempt petition against Raut and journalist Nikhil Wagle over their remarks against the CJI.

The apex court issued notice to both on October 16, asking them to show cause why contempt proceedings should not be initiated against them.

Source: IANS

The post SC defers hearing on Rahul Gandhi, other Oppn leaders’ plea against SIR appeared first on Social News XYZ.

New Delhi, Oct 27 (SocialNews.XYZ) Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant on Tuesday reprimanded a lawyer seeking an urgent listing of a disproportionate assets case against Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha Rahul Gandhi, questioning whether the move was intended to generate media attention.

“There is no head, no tail to this mentioning,” the CJI remarked, taking exception to the grounds cited by the lawyer for seeking an early hearing in the matter.

The lawyer sought the listing of the matter, contending that Rahul Gandhi had recently claimed at an event that he was in touch with 200 officials of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).

Responding to the submission, CJI Kant asked the lawyer, “Have you spoken to any news channel for this?”

Following the exchange, the CJI orally instructed the court staff to discontinue live streaming of the mentioning proceedings henceforth.

The remarks came in the backdrop of the Supreme Court's earlier order staying proceedings before the Allahabad High Court in the disproportionate assets case and restraining the CBI and the ED from submitting any report before the High Court.

The case arises from a complaint filed by Karnataka-based BJP worker S. Vignesh Shishir, who alleged that Rahul Gandhi possessed assets disproportionate to his known sources of income.

In August, the Supreme Court had asked the Allahabad High Court to defer proceedings in the matter and also restrained the central agencies from submitting any report to it.

The top court also said that if any agency has knowledge of any disproportionate assets belonging to any individual, it can proceed on its own, and the same does not require court orders.

The Congress leader had approached the apex court challenging the Allahabad High Court's directions to the CBI and the ED to verify the allegations. He had also filed a separate transfer petition seeking to shift the proceedings from the Allahabad High Court to the Delhi High Court.

Source: IANS

The post CJI Surya Kant pulls up lawyer seeking listing of disproportionate assets case against Rahul Gandhi appeared first on Social News XYZ.

Jabalpur, Oct 27 (SocialNews.XYZ) The Madhya Pradesh Lokayukta on Tuesday conducted searches at multiple premises of a commercial tax officer in Jabalpur, Sagar and Bhopal in a disproportionate assets case, detecting assets and expenditure worth Rs 3.78 crore, officials said.

Lokayukta Deputy Superintendent of Police Neetu Tripathi said the operation was underway in the three districts following information about assets disproportionate to the known income of an Assistant Commissioner and Commercial Tax Officer posted in Damoh.

“He was posted in Jabalpur for a long time,” Tripathi said, adding that the searches were being conducted as part of the investigation into the allegations.

The officer, Manish Kumar Jain, was posted in Damoh at the time of the action. The searches were conducted at his residence in Reliable Developer Colony in Jabalpur and other premises linked to him and his family.

According to the Lokayukta, Superintendent of Police Anjulata Patle received a complaint alleging that Jain had accumulated assets beyond his known sources of income.

Inspector Brij Mohan Singh Narwaria verified the complaint, and the allegations were found to be prima facie correct. A case was subsequently registered against Jain under Sections 13(1)(b) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, as amended in 2018.

The preliminary investigation revealed several properties in Jabalpur, Bhopal and Banda town of Sagar district, including plots and houses registered in the names of Jain and his family members. These include a 278.74-square-metre plot in Jabalpur valued at around Rs 1.43 crore and a 116.14-square-metre plot in the name of his wife, Nidhi Jain, estimated at Rs 95 lakh.

Another plot in her name, on which a bungalow has been constructed, was valued at around Rs 22.87 lakh.

The investigation also identified a flat in Bhopal and properties in Banda registered in the names of Jain’s parents, Shashi Jain and Komal Chand Jain. The officer and his family members had also taken insurance policies involving an estimated expenditure of Rs 33.93 lakh, officials said.

According to the Lokayukta, Jain’s total known income was calculated at Rs 1.03 crore, while expenditure of Rs 3.78 crore had been detected during the investigation so far. The expenditure was 264.64 per cent disproportionate to his known income.

The searches and investigation were continuing, Tripathi said.

Source: IANS

The post MP Lokayukta raids tax officer’s premises in three districts, detects Rs 3.78 crore assets appeared first on Social News XYZ.